<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Trek: The JJJ Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/jjjason/jason-reviews-a-bold-new-movie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/jjjason/jason-reviews-a-bold-new-movie/</link>
	<description>A toy blog written by AFI's best &#38; brightest...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:50:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hourman</title>
		<link>http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/jjjason/jason-reviews-a-bold-new-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-6702</link>
		<dc:creator>Hourman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/?p=1953#comment-6702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;&#039;Sexed up&#039; refers to making something more sexually appealing. Since 2003 it has been used in the sense of making something more attractive than it really is by selective presentation; a modern update to the phrase &#039;hyped up&#039;. Variants include &#039;sex it up&#039;. The implication is that no actual lying is taking place, but that spin is being placed on certain parts of the message.&quot;

Sorry you missed the context, Unc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8216;Sexed up&#8217; refers to making something more sexually appealing. Since 2003 it has been used in the sense of making something more attractive than it really is by selective presentation; a modern update to the phrase &#8216;hyped up&#8217;. Variants include &#8216;sex it up&#8217;. The implication is that no actual lying is taking place, but that spin is being placed on certain parts of the message.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry you missed the context, Unc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sidewinder</title>
		<link>http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/jjjason/jason-reviews-a-bold-new-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-5404</link>
		<dc:creator>Sidewinder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 12:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/?p=1953#comment-5404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a long time Trek fan, this is what I originally thought about this movie...that the timeline was split off and a new one was created that runs parallel with the Prime timeline.

But after thinking about it more, that can&#039;t really be the case.  Thinking back about it:

- City on the Edge of Forever established if you go back into the Prime timeline and change something, it destroys the future of that timeline (Edith died, the Federation didn&#039;t exist in the future).  Oddly enough, Spock was obsessed with correcting the timeline then, but in this movie he doesn&#039;t seem to care.  Which is odd, because he knows how to timetravel thanks to the Slingshot Maneuver.

- Yesterday&#039;s Enterprise showed that if someone come from the past into the future (thus not being around in the past anymore) the timeline will change.

- The Mirror Universe isn&#039;t really a good example, because it is an alternate universe, much like I would suspect the timelines in Parallels were.

I must be getting old...it just hurts to think that something that I love can never continue forward storywise past the point of Romulas&#039; destruction.  And while characters like the crew of DS9 did exist at one point, their ultimate fate is that one day they simply disappeared and a new history was written for them.

I would have been so much happier if Prime Spock had a throwaway line that said that he went back in time to an alternate universe.  That way, there really could have been two distinct timelines.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a long time Trek fan, this is what I originally thought about this movie&#8230;that the timeline was split off and a new one was created that runs parallel with the Prime timeline.</p>
<p>But after thinking about it more, that can&#8217;t really be the case.  Thinking back about it:</p>
<p>- City on the Edge of Forever established if you go back into the Prime timeline and change something, it destroys the future of that timeline (Edith died, the Federation didn&#8217;t exist in the future).  Oddly enough, Spock was obsessed with correcting the timeline then, but in this movie he doesn&#8217;t seem to care.  Which is odd, because he knows how to timetravel thanks to the Slingshot Maneuver.</p>
<p>- Yesterday&#8217;s Enterprise showed that if someone come from the past into the future (thus not being around in the past anymore) the timeline will change.</p>
<p>- The Mirror Universe isn&#8217;t really a good example, because it is an alternate universe, much like I would suspect the timelines in Parallels were.</p>
<p>I must be getting old&#8230;it just hurts to think that something that I love can never continue forward storywise past the point of Romulas&#8217; destruction.  And while characters like the crew of DS9 did exist at one point, their ultimate fate is that one day they simply disappeared and a new history was written for them.</p>
<p>I would have been so much happier if Prime Spock had a throwaway line that said that he went back in time to an alternate universe.  That way, there really could have been two distinct timelines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: batguy1966</title>
		<link>http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/jjjason/jason-reviews-a-bold-new-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-5403</link>
		<dc:creator>batguy1966</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 11:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/?p=1953#comment-5403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For anyone who is curious as to Neros motivation read the prequel comic. It is very very good.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For anyone who is curious as to Neros motivation read the prequel comic. It is very very good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UncleMarsellus</title>
		<link>http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/jjjason/jason-reviews-a-bold-new-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-5402</link>
		<dc:creator>UncleMarsellus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 23:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/?p=1953#comment-5402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sexed up? Seen TOS lately? Big budget and the eye candy that comes with it is a bad thing? Cliff Notes? What did you want? Action movie? Like First Contact or &quot;Picard as Rambo out for revenge for something he&#039;d already gotten over in &#039;I Borg&#039;?&quot; Rebel without a cause? Kinda like the farmboy who is compelled to leave the safety of home for the big adventure out there. Or the billionaire genius who uses his resources for the betterment of his city or the world. Or the aimless youth struggling to live up to the legacy of his father. Or maybe the old &quot;wizard&quot; who guides the hero through their journey. Or the lovable rogue who plays the cynic. Maybe the hero who is so traumatized by an event that he/she is compelled to ensure the same thing never happens to another innocent. Or the child born under unusual circumstances who is destined for greatness. The chosen one. I could go on and on. One man&#039;s archetype is another man&#039;s cliche. Or maybe they&#039;re all cliches.

It&#039;s okay not to like it. I know a couple of fans who despise it too but at least they don&#039;t hide their puritanical (and I mean that kindly, really) view of Trek behind tired key words.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sexed up? Seen TOS lately? Big budget and the eye candy that comes with it is a bad thing? Cliff Notes? What did you want? Action movie? Like First Contact or &#8220;Picard as Rambo out for revenge for something he&#8217;d already gotten over in &#8216;I Borg&#8217;?&#8221; Rebel without a cause? Kinda like the farmboy who is compelled to leave the safety of home for the big adventure out there. Or the billionaire genius who uses his resources for the betterment of his city or the world. Or the aimless youth struggling to live up to the legacy of his father. Or maybe the old &#8220;wizard&#8221; who guides the hero through their journey. Or the lovable rogue who plays the cynic. Maybe the hero who is so traumatized by an event that he/she is compelled to ensure the same thing never happens to another innocent. Or the child born under unusual circumstances who is destined for greatness. The chosen one. I could go on and on. One man&#8217;s archetype is another man&#8217;s cliche. Or maybe they&#8217;re all cliches.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s okay not to like it. I know a couple of fans who despise it too but at least they don&#8217;t hide their puritanical (and I mean that kindly, really) view of Trek behind tired key words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hourman</title>
		<link>http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/jjjason/jason-reviews-a-bold-new-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-5396</link>
		<dc:creator>Hourman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 03:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/?p=1953#comment-5396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Any fan should be proud that their beloved franchise is now being watched by people who didn’t give it any credence before and giving something we love new life.&quot;

That people are watching a movie based on our beloved franchise does not mean they&#039;re giving credence to what the movie is standing on the shoulders of. The movie is J.J. Abrams&#039; sexed-up, action movie, Cliff Notes take on Star Trek, nothing more or less. If that works for you, then more power to ya. I thought it leaned toward the cliched and predictable. That whole &#039;motorcycle ridin&#039; rebel without a cause&#039; schtick was creaky when my grandparents were dating.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Any fan should be proud that their beloved franchise is now being watched by people who didn’t give it any credence before and giving something we love new life.&#8221;</p>
<p>That people are watching a movie based on our beloved franchise does not mean they&#8217;re giving credence to what the movie is standing on the shoulders of. The movie is J.J. Abrams&#8217; sexed-up, action movie, Cliff Notes take on Star Trek, nothing more or less. If that works for you, then more power to ya. I thought it leaned toward the cliched and predictable. That whole &#8216;motorcycle ridin&#8217; rebel without a cause&#8217; schtick was creaky when my grandparents were dating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJJason</title>
		<link>http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/jjjason/jason-reviews-a-bold-new-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-5389</link>
		<dc:creator>JJJason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 16:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/?p=1953#comment-5389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, where&#039;ve they been hiding you? :-)

Needless to say, I agree with everything you said, particularly when it comes to this movie making Star Trek &quot;big&quot; again.  Without even commenting on their quality, Enterprise and Nemesis reduced Trek to a footnote.  Maybe that was inevitable, but it&#039;s now over, and we have J.J. Abrams, Roberto Orci, and Alex Kurtzman to thank for that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, where&#8217;ve they been hiding you? <img src='http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Needless to say, I agree with everything you said, particularly when it comes to this movie making Star Trek &#8220;big&#8221; again.  Without even commenting on their quality, Enterprise and Nemesis reduced Trek to a footnote.  Maybe that was inevitable, but it&#8217;s now over, and we have J.J. Abrams, Roberto Orci, and Alex Kurtzman to thank for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UncleMarsellus</title>
		<link>http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/jjjason/jason-reviews-a-bold-new-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-5388</link>
		<dc:creator>UncleMarsellus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 14:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/?p=1953#comment-5388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The writers, who are fans, were very clever in protecting the existing canon. It wasn&#039;t cast aside. Like JJJason said, the existing canon had to have happened in order for the events of the movie to take place. Like so many Trek episodes before it, it posits the question of how our heroes, and even the universe, would be different if one time altering event occurs. How would Kirk be different if he grew up without a father, for instance? All this is valid and has precedence. 

Yes, it&#039;s a reboot of sorts and a new vision. But it is completely respectful. I even appreciated that all time alterations were purely incidental and not part of some grand plan on the villain&#039;s part to change history. I was concerned about all of this stuff too but now that I&#039;ve seen it, I&#039;m perfectly fine with it. Trek has new life and is relevant again. Any fan should be proud that their beloved franchise is now being watched by people who didn&#039;t give it any credence before and giving something we love new life. 

It&#039;s always easier to be cynical and say no, than to give something a chance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The writers, who are fans, were very clever in protecting the existing canon. It wasn&#8217;t cast aside. Like JJJason said, the existing canon had to have happened in order for the events of the movie to take place. Like so many Trek episodes before it, it posits the question of how our heroes, and even the universe, would be different if one time altering event occurs. How would Kirk be different if he grew up without a father, for instance? All this is valid and has precedence. </p>
<p>Yes, it&#8217;s a reboot of sorts and a new vision. But it is completely respectful. I even appreciated that all time alterations were purely incidental and not part of some grand plan on the villain&#8217;s part to change history. I was concerned about all of this stuff too but now that I&#8217;ve seen it, I&#8217;m perfectly fine with it. Trek has new life and is relevant again. Any fan should be proud that their beloved franchise is now being watched by people who didn&#8217;t give it any credence before and giving something we love new life. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s always easier to be cynical and say no, than to give something a chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brainlock</title>
		<link>http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/jjjason/jason-reviews-a-bold-new-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-5385</link>
		<dc:creator>Brainlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 01:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/?p=1953#comment-5385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Its / Sangreal - 
Go in with an open mind and you might just like it.
I saw it again today, wound up sitting behind some friends, and she wants a sequel NOW.

They make it clear in the movie that they know what has happened to them is completely different from what Old Spock knows happened originally.  They accept that fact and move on after discussing the fact Nero can&#039;t anticipate their moves because they are different people than what he has read about in the Romulan history books/holo&#039;s/whatever.

Think of it more as a time loop, not a retcon if you must, but the shows we all know and love ARE STILL CANON.

Yes, even Voyager.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its / Sangreal &#8211;<br />
Go in with an open mind and you might just like it.<br />
I saw it again today, wound up sitting behind some friends, and she wants a sequel NOW.</p>
<p>They make it clear in the movie that they know what has happened to them is completely different from what Old Spock knows happened originally.  They accept that fact and move on after discussing the fact Nero can&#8217;t anticipate their moves because they are different people than what he has read about in the Romulan history books/holo&#8217;s/whatever.</p>
<p>Think of it more as a time loop, not a retcon if you must, but the shows we all know and love ARE STILL CANON.</p>
<p>Yes, even Voyager.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hourman</title>
		<link>http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/jjjason/jason-reviews-a-bold-new-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-5384</link>
		<dc:creator>Hourman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 22:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/?p=1953#comment-5384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the rate things are getting remade these days, Sangreal, I doubt it will take 20 years.

I would have been happier if they had left Nimoy out and just made a straight up reboot without all the quantum shenanigans. If the old Star Trek was so broken, they should have had the balls to just throw it all out and start from scratch. I would have respected that. The whole &quot;well it sort of is and it sort of isn&#039;t&quot; approach is a little wussy.

Regardless, I still think that new Enterprise is ugly :)

Also, Uhura was always a bit of a hoochie. She kissed Kirk, flirted with Spock, prickteased Mirror-Sulu, and practically climbed on top of Scotty. She&#039;s got to have it!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the rate things are getting remade these days, Sangreal, I doubt it will take 20 years.</p>
<p>I would have been happier if they had left Nimoy out and just made a straight up reboot without all the quantum shenanigans. If the old Star Trek was so broken, they should have had the balls to just throw it all out and start from scratch. I would have respected that. The whole &#8220;well it sort of is and it sort of isn&#8217;t&#8221; approach is a little wussy.</p>
<p>Regardless, I still think that new Enterprise is ugly <img src='http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Also, Uhura was always a bit of a hoochie. She kissed Kirk, flirted with Spock, prickteased Mirror-Sulu, and practically climbed on top of Scotty. She&#8217;s got to have it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJJason</title>
		<link>http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/jjjason/jason-reviews-a-bold-new-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-5383</link>
		<dc:creator>JJJason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 19:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/?p=1953#comment-5383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This movie doesn&#039;t throw away or rape anything.  See it first, then form an opinion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This movie doesn&#8217;t throw away or rape anything.  See it first, then form an opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sangreal</title>
		<link>http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/jjjason/jason-reviews-a-bold-new-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-5382</link>
		<dc:creator>sangreal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 19:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/?p=1953#comment-5382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t plan on seeing this in theaters either.  I&#039;ve been anti retcon since dc&#039;s got so ridiculously out of control.  I&#039;ll probably buy it on dvd (not blu ray) because of nimoys appearance and as a bookend and/or tombstone for star trek as a whole.  but I really don&#039;t see the point of wasting any more money than that on this. not to be personal but It&#039;s interesting that you consider yourself a continuity buff and yet are so comfortable with the casual tossing away of the history that most of us have invested 40 years of attention and emotion in.  oh well, in 20 years or so, someone else will be raping the icons of this generation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t plan on seeing this in theaters either.  I&#8217;ve been anti retcon since dc&#8217;s got so ridiculously out of control.  I&#8217;ll probably buy it on dvd (not blu ray) because of nimoys appearance and as a bookend and/or tombstone for star trek as a whole.  but I really don&#8217;t see the point of wasting any more money than that on this. not to be personal but It&#8217;s interesting that you consider yourself a continuity buff and yet are so comfortable with the casual tossing away of the history that most of us have invested 40 years of attention and emotion in.  oh well, in 20 years or so, someone else will be raping the icons of this generation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Its</title>
		<link>http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/jjjason/jason-reviews-a-bold-new-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-5380</link>
		<dc:creator>Its</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 13:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/?p=1953#comment-5380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know I am not going to like this film. Just by the way the new characters vs. the old ones, its going to take time to adjust. This isn&#039;t just something you do, walk into a theater and BAM! I&#039;M GOING TO LOVE THIS THING!

This isn&#039;t Michael Bay&#039;s Transformers which is clearly a different entity and alternate universe. I would&#039;ve preferred an alnterate universe. 

Its good to see some of the old continuity will continute to exist but once they move forward and do spinoff shows the old shows are no longer going to hold any water. They will get re-run on basic cable and other places but who can take them seriously anymore? Even TNG is in danger with the Spock crossover episodes is in danger.

I just wished they do a DS9 style movie for once that is not focused on Kirk/Spock and the continuity of everythiing.

Sorry for the rant. I&#039;m still not seeing this movie.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I am not going to like this film. Just by the way the new characters vs. the old ones, its going to take time to adjust. This isn&#8217;t just something you do, walk into a theater and BAM! I&#8217;M GOING TO LOVE THIS THING!</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t Michael Bay&#8217;s Transformers which is clearly a different entity and alternate universe. I would&#8217;ve preferred an alnterate universe. </p>
<p>Its good to see some of the old continuity will continute to exist but once they move forward and do spinoff shows the old shows are no longer going to hold any water. They will get re-run on basic cable and other places but who can take them seriously anymore? Even TNG is in danger with the Spock crossover episodes is in danger.</p>
<p>I just wished they do a DS9 style movie for once that is not focused on Kirk/Spock and the continuity of everythiing.</p>
<p>Sorry for the rant. I&#8217;m still not seeing this movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpyMagician</title>
		<link>http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/jjjason/jason-reviews-a-bold-new-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-5379</link>
		<dc:creator>SpyMagician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 03:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/?p=1953#comment-5379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just to be a total Star Trek Nerd:

All the past series&#039; events are NOT necessarily overwritten IF you accept that the Star Trek Universe operates under the theory of Quantum Reality, as illustrated in the TNG Episode, &quot;Parallels.&quot; According to that theory, &quot;...all the infinite number of possible outcomes of all events that occur happen in alternate quantum realities.&quot;

http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Quantum_reality

Thus, the events of the new &quot;Star Trek&quot; film are basically the introduction of a new Star Trek Quantum Reality created by the time travel actions of &quot;Ambassador Spock&quot; who appears to be from the previously established Quantum Reality depicted in the previous series.

Spy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to be a total Star Trek Nerd:</p>
<p>All the past series&#8217; events are NOT necessarily overwritten IF you accept that the Star Trek Universe operates under the theory of Quantum Reality, as illustrated in the TNG Episode, &#8220;Parallels.&#8221; According to that theory, &#8220;&#8230;all the infinite number of possible outcomes of all events that occur happen in alternate quantum realities.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Quantum_reality" rel="nofollow">http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Quantum_reality</a></p>
<p>Thus, the events of the new &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; film are basically the introduction of a new Star Trek Quantum Reality created by the time travel actions of &#8220;Ambassador Spock&#8221; who appears to be from the previously established Quantum Reality depicted in the previous series.</p>
<p>Spy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Cope</title>
		<link>http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/jjjason/jason-reviews-a-bold-new-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-5378</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Cope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 01:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/?p=1953#comment-5378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Uhura&#039;s Orion roomie is played by Rachel Nichols who&#039;ll next be seen as Scarlett in GI Joe.

Glad you liked it Commish!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uhura&#8217;s Orion roomie is played by Rachel Nichols who&#8217;ll next be seen as Scarlett in GI Joe.</p>
<p>Glad you liked it Commish!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brainlock</title>
		<link>http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/jjjason/jason-reviews-a-bold-new-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-5377</link>
		<dc:creator>Brainlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 01:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/?p=1953#comment-5377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;-Except maybe for Voyager. &quot;

LOL!  I applaud you, sirrah!
(and poor Porthos 45th!)

I wasn&#039;t too keen on the Z+Z romance, but I have to agree that Urban&#039;s McCoy was so near flawless to De&#039;s that I kept forgetting it WASN&#039;T De!

Cross did an ok job at Sarek, as did Noni as Amanda.  Too bad we hardly saw more than a few others of the alleged 6 Billion Vulcans when...something spoilery happens.  Quinto&#039;s shaved Sybrows turned Zpock-brows were kinda annoying, tho.  Not so much Nimoy&#039;s or even Cross&#039;.

oh, and Uhura&#039;s roommate looked like she had painted skin.  Michael Cera in the &#039;Year One&#039; trailer we got looked more realistic in his gold paint. Voyager does trump this movie in that respect , as did YC. ;p
(ok, I admit I watched that ep to see Wight)


also, needs more Grunny!  His all too brief cameo wasn&#039;t enough! LOL!
(Jake and his brothers are sure to be hating their father&#039;s character in a few years!)

I&#039;m going back tomorrow!  Too bad we don&#039;t have IMAX out here. :(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;-Except maybe for Voyager. &#8221;</p>
<p>LOL!  I applaud you, sirrah!<br />
(and poor Porthos 45th!)</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t too keen on the Z+Z romance, but I have to agree that Urban&#8217;s McCoy was so near flawless to De&#8217;s that I kept forgetting it WASN&#8217;T De!</p>
<p>Cross did an ok job at Sarek, as did Noni as Amanda.  Too bad we hardly saw more than a few others of the alleged 6 Billion Vulcans when&#8230;something spoilery happens.  Quinto&#8217;s shaved Sybrows turned Zpock-brows were kinda annoying, tho.  Not so much Nimoy&#8217;s or even Cross&#8217;.</p>
<p>oh, and Uhura&#8217;s roommate looked like she had painted skin.  Michael Cera in the &#8216;Year One&#8217; trailer we got looked more realistic in his gold paint. Voyager does trump this movie in that respect , as did YC. ;p<br />
(ok, I admit I watched that ep to see Wight)</p>
<p>also, needs more Grunny!  His all too brief cameo wasn&#8217;t enough! LOL!<br />
(Jake and his brothers are sure to be hating their father&#8217;s character in a few years!)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going back tomorrow!  Too bad we don&#8217;t have IMAX out here. <img src='http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darth_Ennis</title>
		<link>http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/jjjason/jason-reviews-a-bold-new-movie/comment-page-1/#comment-5376</link>
		<dc:creator>Darth_Ennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 01:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/?p=1953#comment-5376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I couldn&#039;t agree more.

I thought it was a phenominal film, and I can say this wuith all honesty that I absolutely despise Star Trek.

This was one reboot I can definately get behind.

I honestly thought this movie would suck, but I will admit that I enjoyed it more than the last 3 Star Wars films, and I AM a Star Wars fan.

This is about as high of praise as I can give.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more.</p>
<p>I thought it was a phenominal film, and I can say this wuith all honesty that I absolutely despise Star Trek.</p>
<p>This was one reboot I can definately get behind.</p>
<p>I honestly thought this movie would suck, but I will admit that I enjoyed it more than the last 3 Star Wars films, and I AM a Star Wars fan.</p>
<p>This is about as high of praise as I can give.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
