Comments on: The sexiest action figure ever… http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/jjjason/the-sexiest-action-figure-ever/ A toy blog written by AFI's best & brightest... Sat, 18 May 2013 13:07:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Wildcard http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/jjjason/the-sexiest-action-figure-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-3997 Wildcard Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:18:45 +0000 http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/?p=408#comment-3997 I’d have to agree with you on this figure. I don’t collect Marvel Legends but I had to buy this set. Even this gay boy had to have her.

]]> By: Jason Geyer http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/jjjason/the-sexiest-action-figure-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-3996 Jason Geyer Tue, 05 Aug 2008 15:20:01 +0000 http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/?p=408#comment-3996 That backside is something else, too!

Actually, the original She-Hulk sculpt *was* much taller and in scale for She-Hulk. I guess when they decided on the dual use for the body they had the factory pantograph it down a bit more.

I say bravo to Hasbro for getting us an amazing Shanna, done right. But boo-urns for the tiny She-Hulk who looks like she’s wearing a cooking apron. ESPECIALLY at $15 a pop.

Ah well.

]]> By: Toythinker http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/jjjason/the-sexiest-action-figure-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-3995 Toythinker Tue, 05 Aug 2008 12:36:56 +0000 http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/?p=408#comment-3995 Ditto…ahem…

]]> By: Jim Abell http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/jjjason/the-sexiest-action-figure-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-3994 Jim Abell Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:59:57 +0000 http://www.actionfigureinsider.com/blog/?p=408#comment-3994 Ya know, I was very disappointed when I found out how much smaller the new She-Hulk was compared to last year’s version and, by-jove, I think you’ve discovered the truth behind her smaller stature…

(Psssst, Jason… you didn’t include a backside photo… I’m just sayin’…)

]]>