|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 2 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
4-L.O.T.T.
|
Post subject: Which figure do you think could've been near perfect but... Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 2:49 pm |
|
| Hangin' with the big boys |
 |
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 6:30 pm Posts: 325
|
|
(or "the what were they thinking" discussion thread ) So I just picked up the DCUC Azreal Batman/Batman knightsend 2 pack for $17. at a toy wholesaler. The Batman looks great without the black shadowing on the cowl but the "battle damage" emblem....well I all can think of is "why?" Yes it goes with the storyline but otherwise it could have been Mattel's (IMO) quintessential Bronze age Batman figure. What figs do you think could have been your "default" figure if only the toy company that manufactured them had not gone overboard or made that one wrong decision?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
UncleMarsellus
|
Post subject: Re: Which figure do you think could've been near perfect but Posted: Fri May 03, 2013 9:18 am |
|
 |
| Knows his stuff |
 |
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 10:14 am Posts: 563 Location: The cultural wasteland of Miami, FL
|
|
DC Collectibles most recent Arkham City super-articulated Batman. What the heck were they thinking with those shorts? If not for that and the odd head (I'm not sure if it's too small or too weird), it'd be a definitive representation. Mattel's version was also nearly excellent if not for the short arms.
DC Collectibles and Mattel both do "almost" very well. Tons of examples to choose from.
_________________ When you don't know what you really want, you end up with a lot you don't.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 2 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|
|